Title: Bullseye dielectric cavities for photon collection from a surface-mounted point source
Citation
Hekmati R, Hadden J, Mathew A, et al. (2022). Bullseye dielectric cavities for photon collection from a surface-mounted point source. Cardiff University. https://doi.org/10.17035/d.2022.0218102868
Access Rights: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Access Method: https://doi.org/10.17035/d.2022.0218102868 will take you to the repository page for this dataset, where you will be able to download the data or find further access information, as appropriate.
Cardiff University Dataset Creators
Dataset Details
Publisher: Cardiff University
Date (year) of data becoming publicly available: 2022
Data format: .xlsx
Estimated total storage size of dataset: Less than 100 megabytes
DOI : 10.17035/d.2022.0218102868
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.17035/d.2022.0218102868
These data represent the paper's numerical results with the dataset's title. This dataset contains 21 *.xlsx files in which each file name belongs to the figure's subplots. Figure 1b > Collection efficiency & Purcell factor vs. Wavelength Figure 2a > Purcell factor vs. Wavelength vs. Central disk diameter Figure 3a > Collection efficiency & Purcell factor vs. polar angle (1nm above and middle of the disk) Figure 4a > Excitation enhancement vs. Number of rings (532nm and emission wavelength) (1nm above and middle of the disk) Figure 5a > Collection efficiency vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (1st ring) Figure 6c > Collection efficiency vs. Number of rings (with and without apodization) Research results based upon these data are published at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32359-0
Description
Figure 2b > Purcell factor vs. Wavelength vs. Duty cycle
Figure 2c > Collection efficiency vs. Wavelength vs. Central disk diameter
Figure 2d > Collection efficiency vs. Wavelength vs. Duty cycle
Figure 3b > Purcell factor vs. X & Y displacement
Figure 3c > Collection efficiency vs. X & Y displacement
Figure 3d > Collection efficiency & Purcell factor vs. Z displacement
Figure 4b > Radiative decay rate enhancement vs. Number of rings
Figure 4c > Collection efficiency enhancement vs. Number of rings
Figure 4d > Effective enhancement vs. Number of rings (532nm and emission wavelength) (1nm above and middle of the disk)
Figure 5b > Purcell factor vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (1st ring)
Figure 5c > Collection efficiency vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (2nd ring)
Figure 5d > Purcell factor vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (2nd ring)
Figure 5e > Collection efficiency vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (2nd ring)
Figure 5e > Purcell factor vs. Duty cycle vs. Ring period (2nd ring)
Figure 6d > Purcell factor vs. Number of rings (with and without apodization)
Related Projects
- EPSRC Hub in Quantum Computing and Simulation (01/12/2019 - 31/05/2025)
- Manufacturing scalable semiconductor quantum light sources (01/10/2020 - 30/09/2026)